Rev. Douglas Whitelaw, M.A. is the executive director of Ark Aid Mission in London, Ontario. This post is from his paper 'Toward A Theology of Suffering'.
SECTION 4/9
_____________________________________________________
So, for now, we
live in a broken world and this has some consequences we should notice in terms
of suffering. One would concern natural disasters or 'acts of God.' God takes a
lot of heat for these; many have lost their faith from suffering one and
critical atheists like Christopher Hitchins and Richard Dawkins rarely pass an
opportunity to impugn God's existence or character for such events. But, while
God allows such events, he does so in the sense that he also allows us to carry
on in the created order we crippled. God has bound himself to us and his world
to work patiently towards the restoration of his rule in a way that humans can
be included. Perhaps he could have done it another way – we'll never know. This
is akin to Liebniz' 'best of all possible worlds,' the central concept in his
theodicy. It evidently is the best of such worlds with us still in it and
living in the world broken by sin means it is hostile. An emphasis on God's
soteriological purposes rather than his absolute responsibility should bear some
pastoral comfort.
If we allow Him to, God will carry us through the chaos of His created world that we are responsible for crippling? Interesting... I like that.
ReplyDelete